Read the asymmetry
Explain why one-to-one debunking loses and where an analyst-hour earns the most belief.
A false claim takes seconds to make. A sound correction takes hours. Stop fighting one claim at a time. Learn to operate above the claim, where defensive effort earns a return.
Enroll NowThe energy needed to refute disinformation runs an order of magnitude above the energy needed to produce it. An analyst who answers every claim loses on exchange rate and surrenders the tempo. The course teaches the way out.
Seven measurable outcomes, scored against a capstone tabletop on the final hour.
Explain why one-to-one debunking loses and where an analyst-hour earns the most belief.
Build a ranked narrative inventory from a body of hostile content.
Locate seeds, amplifiers, host communities, and the emotional trigger that carries reach.
Spot the seven manipulation moves and the tell that exposes each one.
Build audience resistance before exposure with technique-based inoculation.
Construct a truthful story that meets the threat on values and identity.
Triage on reach, falsifiability, and decision-relevance. Know when silence wins.
Each module follows the Pherson section order and closes with a hands-on exercise on a sanitized intelligence feed.
Brandolini's Law, the economics of disinformation, and why debunking loses on exchange rate.
45 min · Exercise 1.1The diagnostic distinction, the six recurring parent narratives, and the narrative inventory.
55 min · Exercise 2.1The seven techniques, the tell for each, and the link to reflexive control.
65 min · Exercise 3.1Node-and-edge mapping, super-spreaders, and measuring travel over volume.
55 min · Exercise 4.1Inoculation theory, technique-based prebunking that scales, the 90-second prebunk.
55 min · Exercise 5.1Simple, value-anchored, truthful. The ethics and legal boundary built in.
55 min · Exercise 6.1Debunk, prebunk, engage, or stay silent. The reach × falsifiability × relevance triage.
45 min · Exercise 7.1A 72-hour coordinated narrative push against a fictional target. Six deliverables, scored on a weighted rubric.
75 min · Team exercisePractitioners who confront organized influence activity and answer for the response.
The questions practitioners ask before enrolling.
Intelligence and counterintelligence analysts, strategic communication and public-affairs staff, trust-and-safety and brand-protection teams, OSINT and threat-intelligence practitioners, and policy and crisis-response leads who confront organized influence activity.
A working foundation in structured analytic techniques. The course builds on SATs rather than teaching them from the start.
One day, seven and a half instructional hours, delivered in person or live online, plus a self-paced video edition. Seven modules, six hands-on exercises, and a closing tabletop capstone.
No. The course judges manipulation by its mechanics, never by the politics of the source. The toolkit applies to foreign-state operations, non-state networks, and domestic movements across the spectrum.
Build a ranked narrative inventory, map an influence ecosystem to its highest-pressure node, name the seven manipulation techniques on sight, design a technique-based prebunk, write a value-anchored counter-narrative, and run a reach-falsifiability-relevance triage to choose a response, including silence.
Per seat. Includes the participant workbook, sanitized exercise feeds, the capstone packet, and a certificate of completion.
Enroll in CW-NARR-201Treadstone 71 · Cognitive Warfare Series · Heuer is foundational. The Treadstone 71 Advanced SATs are operational.